People called Amitabh impotent, angry Indians said they will not forgive him | Public Anger on Amitabh

.

.

.

play video:

Public Outrage Against Amitabh Bachchan’s Silence on Pahalgam Terror Attack: A Nation Demands Accountability

By Final Cut News Desk

Introduction

India is no stranger to tragedy, but when terror strikes, the nation unites in grief and anger. Such was the case after the horrific terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed the lives of 28 innocent tourists. The incident not only shocked the conscience of the country but also ignited a wave of outrage, grief, and debate across social media platforms, television screens, and drawing rooms nationwide.

While political leaders, citizens, and celebrities alike expressed their condolences and condemnation, one name stood out for his conspicuous silence: Amitabh Bachchan. The legendary actor, often hailed as the “Shahenshah” of Bollywood and a voice of the nation, became the unlikely target of public fury after his ambiguous tweet in the aftermath of the tragedy. This article explores the incident, the social media backlash, the defense mounted by his fans, and the larger question of celebrity responsibility in times of national crisis.

The Pahalgam Terror Attack: A Nation in Mourning

On a fateful night in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, terrorists unleashed violence upon a group of unsuspecting tourists. The attack resulted in the tragic loss of 28 lives, leaving the nation in mourning and sparking widespread anger. News of the attack dominated headlines, with visuals of grieving families and survivors flooding television channels and social media feeds.

As is customary in such times, the country looked to its leaders, influencers, and public figures for solace, solidarity, and support. Many Bollywood celebrities took to their social media accounts to express their grief, offer condolences to the bereaved families, and condemn the heinous act. Hashtags related to the attack trended on Twitter, with thousands joining in to demand justice and unity.

Amitabh Bachchan’s Tweet: The Spark That Lit the Fire

In the midst of this collective mourning, Amitabh Bachchan, a figure revered for his eloquence and moral gravitas, posted a tweet from his official Twitter account at 1:20 AM. The tweet, however, was cryptic and devoid of any clear message: “t5356.” The rest of the tweet was left blank.

For a man whose words have inspired generations, this tweet was seen as not only inadequate but also insensitive by many. Social media users quickly noticed the actor’s silence on the Pahalgam attack and began questioning his priorities. Was this a technical error, a coded message, or simply an attempt to avoid commenting on a sensitive issue? The ambiguity only fueled the anger.

Social Media Backlash: “Why Are You Silent, Sir?”

The response from netizens was swift and brutal. Twitter and Instagram were flooded with comments criticizing Amitabh Bachchan for his silence and perceived apathy. Some users resorted to sarcasm, asking if his wife, Jaya Bachchan, had taken away his phone. Others were more direct, demanding to know why he had not spoken out about the Pahalgam tragedy.

One user wrote, “Jaya ji ne phone cheen liya kya?” (Did Jaya ji take your phone away?). Another commented, “Will you not say anything about what happened in Pahalgam?” A third user lamented, “Respected Sir, sometimes it is necessary to speak up. Silence after such a massacre is not right.” Yet another added, “At least say something, Sir. In times like these, you should stand with the nation.”

The underlying sentiment was clear: Amitabh Bachchan’s silence was not just disappointing, it was unacceptable. For a man who has historically used his voice to address social issues, his reticence on this occasion was seen as a betrayal.

Fans Come to His Defense

Not everyone was critical, however. Amitabh Bachchan’s loyal fan base quickly rallied to his defense, arguing that the tweet might have been his way of expressing that he was at a loss for words in the face of such tragedy. Some fans suggested that the ambiguous tweet was, in fact, a silent tribute to the victims, and that not all emotions can be adequately expressed through words.

One fan wrote, “Perhaps he wanted to say that he has no words for what happened in Pahalgam. Sometimes silence is the most powerful response.” Another added, “Big B has always stood with the nation. Let’s not judge him for one tweet.”

Despite these defenses, the majority of social media users remained unconvinced. The debate raged on, with hashtags like #AmitabhBachchanSilent and #SpeakUpBigB trending for hours.

The Burden of Celebrity: Is Silence an Option?

The controversy surrounding Amitabh Bachchan’s tweet raises important questions about the role and responsibility of celebrities in times of national crisis. In a country where film stars are often revered as demi-gods, their words and actions carry immense weight. When tragedy strikes, the public expects its icons to offer comfort, solidarity, and sometimes even leadership.

Amitabh Bachchan, the son of renowned poet Harivansh Rai Bachchan and a master of words himself, has built a reputation for his articulate and thoughtful commentary on social issues. For many, his failure to adequately address the Pahalgam attack was not just a personal disappointment, but a symbolic one. If a man celebrated for his command over language could not find words in a moment of national grief, what hope was there for others?

This expectation is not unique to Amitabh Bachchan. Across the world, celebrities are increasingly being called upon to use their platforms for social and political causes. From climate change to racial injustice, the public now demands that its stars take a stand.

The Double-Edged Sword of Social Media

Social media has amplified both the reach and the scrutiny of celebrities. While platforms like Twitter and Instagram allow stars to connect directly with their fans, they also expose them to instant and often harsh criticism. In the case of Amitabh Bachchan, what might have once been a private struggle with grief or words became a public spectacle.

The incident also highlights the dangers of miscommunication in the digital age. A single ambiguous tweet can spark outrage, speculation, and even character assassination. For celebrities, the pressure to “say the right thing” is immense, and the consequences of failing to do so can be severe.

The Responsibility of Bollywood and Beyond

The controversy has reignited the debate about the social responsibility of Bollywood and other influential industries. Should film stars be obligated to comment on every national tragedy? Is silence a sign of apathy or a legitimate response to grief? Where does personal choice end and public duty begin?

Some commentators argue that celebrities must recognize their influence and use it for the greater good. Others caution against imposing unreasonable expectations on individuals who may themselves be struggling to process traumatic events.

What is clear, however, is that in times of national crisis, the public looks to its icons for guidance and reassurance. Whether fair or not, the burden of expectation falls heavily on the shoulders of those in the spotlight.

Conclusion: A Teachable Moment

The outrage against Amitabh Bachchan’s silence in the wake of the Pahalgam terror attack is a reflection of a nation’s grief, anger, and desire for unity. It is also a reminder of the evolving relationship between celebrities and the public in the age of social media.

For Amitabh Bachchan, the incident may serve as a lesson in the power—and peril—of words, or the lack thereof. For the rest of us, it is an opportunity to reflect on the nature of public discourse, the limits of celebrity influence, and the importance of empathy in times of tragedy.

As India mourns its lost sons and daughters, one thing is certain: in moments of darkness, the nation yearns for voices that can heal, inspire, and unite. Whether those voices come from politicians, poets, or film stars, their absence is felt as deeply as the tragedy itself.